T.I. & Tiny Harris File Motion To Dismiss Sexual Assault Lawsuit

T.I. and Tiny Harris are hoping to get the newest lawsuit filed in opposition to them dismissed.

The couple lately filed a movement to have a sexual assault lawsuit filed in opposition to them in January, based on studies from PEOPLE.

A Jane Doe filed a lawsuit in opposition to the couple again in January. In her grievance, she claims that the Georgia natives  drugged her after assembly her at a membership in Los Angeles again in 2005. Doe alleges they then took her again to their lodge room and raped her.

Doe says she was in her early 20s whereas serving within the U.S. Air Pressure and stationed in Los Angeles when she met the couple. She was allegedly launched to the musicians within the VIP part of a membership, and whereas there, Doe claims that Tiny gave her a drink after which introduced her again to a lodge room with T.I. and two different ladies.

After the opposite ladies left, Doe claims the couple joined her within the bathe, after which Tiny took her clothes. The Air Pressure Veteran went on to allege that she was “signaled” to get into mattress with T.I. and felt “extraordinarily dizzy and lightheaded,” main her to imagine she was drugged.

On June 27, paperwork obtained by PEOPLE reveal that T.I. and Tiny filed a movement asking a federal choose in California to dismiss the case. The couple is urging the choose to throw out the swimsuit “in its entirety, with prejudice” on grounds that the statute of limitations on Doe’s “time-barred” claims has expired.

T.I., actual identify Clifford Harris, and Tiny, actual identify Tameka Harris, additionally declare that the unnamed lady’s lawsuit “fails to allege info to sufficiently set up any of the claims alleged within the Criticism.”

“Right here, at greatest, Plaintiff had as much as December 31, 2007, to file the moment lawsuit based mostly on the info alleged within the Criticism,” the movement reads, based on the outlet. “As such, this immediate lawsuit, filed over sixteen years previous that statutory deadline – 18 years after the info alleged within the Criticism occurred is time-barred, together with all of the claims asserted within the Criticism.”

The movement additionally alleges “there aren’t any info by any means that would redeem or revive any actionable claims by Plaintiff in opposition to Defendants based mostly on the 2005 encounter alleged within the Criticism.”

Doe is searching for unspecified damages for sexual battery, battery, sexual assault, negligence, false imprisonment and intentional infliction of emotional misery.